检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾士琴 徐亚群[1] 汪海州[1] 王振盛[1] 沈晓宇[1]
机构地区:[1]常州市武进中医医院急诊科,江苏常州213161
出 处:《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2016年第6期148-149,共2页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
基 金:常州市武进区科技计划项目(编号:WS201429)
摘 要:目的:探讨经皮穴位电刺激(TAES)防治插管洗胃中不良反应的效果。方法:选择64例服毒需洗胃的患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各32例。观察组在洗胃前3min开始持续经皮穴位电刺激足三里、梁丘、内关、合谷穴,对照组采用传统洗胃方法。结果:观察组患者不良反应发生率及发生次数明显少于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者置管时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。洗胃中、洗胃后观察组患者SBP、HR均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:经皮穴位电刺激能缩短置管时间,减少对患者BP和HR的影响,有效防治插管洗胃中的不良反应。Objective:To investigate the effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TAES) in control of adverse reactions of gastric lavage.Methods:64 patients who needed gastric lavage were randomly divided into observation group (n=32) and control group (n=32). The observation group was given continuous TAES on acupoints of Zusanli, Liangqiu, Neiguan and Hegu from 3 minutes before beginning lavage. The control group was given traditional method of gastric lavage.Results:The incidence and frequency of adverse reactions in observation group were significantly less than in control group (P〈 0.05).The catheterization time in observation group was significantly shorter (P〈 0.05). The SBP and HR of patients in observation group were significantly lower during and after gastric lavage (P〈 0.05).Conclusion:TAES can reduce catheter time and the impact on patients of BP and HR, meanwhile it can effectively prevent adverse reactions of gastric lavage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.250.24