检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学公共事务学院
出 处:《中国人力资源开发》2017年第1期116-123,共8页Human Resources Development of China
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"高层次人才发展战略的执行效果评估研究"(ZK1009)资助
摘 要:随着各级政府高层次人才引进政策的出台与实施,学界对高层次人才引进政策的研究日趋增多,地方人才吸引力水平的评价也日益受到学者们的关注。然而,目前的吸引力评价并未区分客观吸引力与政策吸引力,而是着重于对总体吸引力进行评价,这就不利于对政策设计水平进行客观评价,从而推动政策改进。本文以省级政府的高层次人才引进政策为研究对象,通过建构政策吸引力相关指标,利用因子分析法测量出客观吸引力与政策的绝对吸引力,进而将各省级政府政策的绝对吸引力与客观吸引力进行比较,获得对各省高层次人才政策的相对吸引力评价结果。在此基础上,本文指出,良好的政策吸引力可以在一定程度上弥补客观吸引力的不足,客观发展状况较差的省份如果要吸引高层次人才,必须制定出一系列良好的引才政策。The study on the high-level talents recruitment policy are increasing along with the introduc6on and implementation of these policies by various levels of governments. As a result, the evaluation of local talent attraction is becoming a salient topic to the researchers. However, current evaluation of the talent attraction pays attention to the general attraction of one place, rather than differentiating the policy attraction from objective attraction, which cannot contribute to the objective evaluation of the policy design and, hence, cannot promote policy improvement. This paper aims to evalua'te the highAeve~ talent recruitment policy's absolute attraction at the provincial level using factor analysis. Then, based on the comparison of the provincial policies' absolute and objective attraction, it will measure the relative attraction of the talent recruitment policy of the provincial governments. Finally, the paper points out that strong policy attraction can, to a certain extent, make up for the lack of objective attraction. Therefore, provincial governments, especially those with poor development performance, are supposed to develop good recruitment policy in order to attract high-level talents.
关 键 词:省级政府 高层次人才引进政策 政策吸引力 因子分析
分 类 号:C964.2[经济管理—人力资源管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249