检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴文广[1] 吴向嵩[1] 李茂岚[1] 王许安[1] 梁海滨[1] 刘颖斌[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普通外科,200092
出 处:《中华外科杂志》2017年第1期37-40,共4页Chinese Journal of Surgery
摘 要:胰腺癌恶性程度高、预后差,根治性切除是目前治愈胰腺癌的唯一可能的方法。而R0切除的标准、切缘的定义、病理学检查等尚缺乏统一的标准,胰头癌手术切缘对患者预后的影响仍饱受争议。与以往的观念不同,目前认为R1切除率高不是外科手术质量差的指标,而是说明病理学检查的质量高。期待胰头癌标本病理学检查的国际共识尽早发布,以更好地明确手术切缘与临床预后的关系,指导医师选择更合理的治疗策略。Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a highly aggressive disease with a grim prognosis. Surgical resection offers the best chance for long-term survival. Negative-margin resection still remains the goal, the influence of margin status on outcomes in pancreatic head carcinoma remains controversial, as conflicting data have been plagued by a lack of standardization in R0 resection and margin definitions, pathologic analysis, and reporting. In contrast to common belief, a high rate of R1 resections in pancreatic cancer is not a marker of low-quality surgery but rather of high-quality pathology. The international pathological consensus of pancreatic head carcinoma is still needed to fully understand the prognostic value of margin status in order to optimize treatment strategy for this disease.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.102.138