对我国设立预审法官的法律思考——兼论德国侦查法官与法国预审法官之比较  

Legal Thought of Setting up Preliminary Judges in China

作　　者：王俊阳[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2016年第6期93-105,共13页Journal of Hubei University of Police

摘　　要：侦查决定了刑事诉讼的内容,起诉决定了刑事诉讼的走向。为有效制约和控制二者,预审应运而生。在德、法两国刑事诉讼中,预审法官都曾是这一制约手段的关键。后因价值取向的不同,德国走上了与法国式预审法官不同的道路。其分别设置了侦查法官和中间程序,但对侦查和起诉的制约和控制仍是德法两国的共同追求。为了更好地制约我国公安机关庞大的侦查权,同时对检察机关的起诉进行监督,实现诉讼的公正和效率,在我国设立预审法官不失为一种可行的方法。Investigation determines the content of criminal proceeding and prosecution decides the trend of criminal proceeding. In order to restrict and control both of them, antecedent trial emerged. In German and French criminal proceedings, pre-trial judges were once the key mean for restriction, but Germany went a different way from France due to the divergent value orientation in later, which sets up ermittlungsrichter and zwischenverfahren.However, it is still the common pursuit for both of them to restrict and control the criminal investigation and prosecution. With the purpose of limiting investigation of public security organs and supervising prosecution of procuratorial organs in our country, and realizing fair and efficiency, it can yet be regarded as a feasible method to set up pre-trial judges in China.

关 键 词：预审 预审法官 侦查法官 德国 法国 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]