论民事诉讼中的查明责任与证明责任  

On Identifying Responsibility and Proving Responsibility in Civil Litigation

作　　者：李峣[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京政法职业学院应用法律系

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2016年第4期26-30,共5页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：不同的诉讼模式,法官所承担的证据责任差异极大,当事人主义模式之下的法官多承担消极的查明责任,而职权主义诉讼模式中,则承担一定程度的证明责任,查明与证明责任皆表现为法官对案件事实的实际态度及应对,二者界限不明导致实际操作上的障碍与低效,甚至无法探究到或错过案件真实。Evidence responsibility borne by the judge shows great differences in different litigation modes. The judge bears passive identifying responsibility under the mode of party-orientation, while in the mode of inquisitorial litigation, the judge assumes the proving responsibility to a certain degree. The responsibilities of identifying and proving both reflect the judge＇s actual attitude and response to the case.The unclarity of these responsibilities not only lead to inefficient operation, but also make it impossible to explore the truth of the case.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 查明责任 证明责任 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]