检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐岩[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学社会学与人类学学院
出 处:《青年研究》2017年第1期47-56,共10页Youth Studies
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"中国城乡青年社会资本与幸福感的比较研究--以珠三角为例"(12YJC840048)的阶段性成果;国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(71301170)的支持
摘 要:本研究通过对广州市7所高校共756名1-4年级在校大学生的问卷调查,分析比较了不同户籍的大学生在幸福感与家庭社会经济地位上的差异,并通过结构方程模型对大学生家庭社会经济地位、感受性社会支持与幸福感的关系进行了验证与分析。研究发现,城镇户籍大学生的幸福感体验(主要是生活满意度指标)与社会支持显著高于农村户籍大学生,并且家庭社会经济地位差异影响着大学生对幸福的主观体验。家庭社会经济地位不仅直接影响着大学生个体的幸福感,更重要的是通过感受性社会支持间接影响个体幸福感体验。最后,依据研究结果对高校学生工作提出了建议。Through the questionnaire survey of 756 college students from freshmen to seniors in seven colleges in Guangzhou,this study analyzes and compares the differences in subjective well-being and family socioeconomic status among college students with different household registrations. Through structural equation modeling,we testify and analyze the relationships among college students' family socioeconomic status,perceived social support and subjective well-being. According to the findings,for college students with urban household registration,they have higher experience of happiness and social support significantly than those with rural household registration; the difference in family socioeconomic status would influence college students' subjective experience of happiness. The family socioeconomic status would not only influence college students' subjective well-being,but more importantly,it would indirectly influence the individuals' experience of subjective well-being through perceived social support.Finally,based on the results,this study provides some suggestions for student affairs in colleges.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.85