仲裁程序开始的设置及其必要性分析  

作　　者：刘晓清[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2016年第4期180-196,共17页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

基　　金：2016年度厦门市社科重点项目《区域性国际商事纠纷解决中心的城市功能定位》的阶段性成果

摘　　要：仲裁程序的开始是仲裁程序启动的重要时间节点，既是客观事实，也是法律事实，具有一定的法律意义。国外立法及仲裁规则对仲裁程序的开始作出了不同规定。我国《仲裁法》对此暂无规定，各仲裁机构通过仲裁规则分别确立“收到说”、“受理说”，其中部分仲裁规则确定仲裁程序开始的时间有转变。我国仲裁界主流观点是“受理说”，其基础是“可仲裁性”，但是这种做法忽略了仲裁程序开始的重要性。作为独立的程序，仲裁程序的开始有设置的必要性，体现为仲裁规范设置的基本要求、程序衔接的融洽性、仲裁程序开始的法律意义和国际惯例方面。因此，仲裁程序开始的设置在遵循意思自治的前提下，应确立自愿原则，明确仲裁程序开始时间，完善配套规则，保持条文形式和内容逻辑清晰，语序正确，同时，在制度上应注意仲裁程序开始与相关制度统一，合理衔接仲裁程序和诉讼程序。The commencement of arbitration is an important time node, which is not only an objective fact, but also a legal fact, having certain legal significance. Foreign legislation and arbitration rules make different provisions to the commencement of arbitration. However, the Arbitration Law in China have no relevant provisions temporarily, the ar- bitration institution established arbitration rules, such as ＂ Refe- rred＂, ＂Accepted＂, which part of the arbitration rules revised during the progress. In China＇s arbitration academic circle, most of them hold the view of ＂Accepted＂, which based on ＂arbitration＂, but this ignored its importance. As an independent progress, it＇s necessary to setup the arbitration commencing proceedings, especially in the arbitration rules＇ basic requirements, cohesion of the procedures harmonious, meaning of the arbitration proceedings and international practice. Therefore, the com- mencement of arbitration proceedings＇ settings should obey the principle of autonomy, especially the voluntary principle, then define the commencing time, improve the matching rules, to keep the provisions, form and logic in right order. At the same time, pay attention to the unity with re- lated system and litigation procedure.

关 键 词：仲裁程序的开始 意思自治 申请 受理 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]