《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定(TPP)》网络服务提供者侵权责任规则评析——兼评我国网络服务提供者版权侵权责任制度  

Liability of Internet Service Provider in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) and Its Relation to Relevant Rules in China

作　　者：喻玲[1] YU Ling(Law School of Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China)

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,长沙410082

出　　处：《华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期84-92,共9页Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"基于我国生效判决的反不正当竞争中的知识产权保护实证研究"(14CFX042);教育部人文社科青年项目"云计算技术相关版权法问题研究"(11YJC820156)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：2016年2月4日以美国为首的12国正式签署《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定(TPP)》,该协议设专章专节对网络服务提供者版权侵权责任进行了详细规定,确立了现有国际公约和区域条约中最为详细的网络服务商侵权责任制度。经过多轮谈判(过程中泄露文本有2013年文莱斯里巴加湾会议讨论稿和2014年越南胡志明会议讨论稿),最终文本很大程度上接受了2011年美国建议稿中的"安全港"规则和"法律激励"规则。与我国网络服务提供者侵权责任制度相比,尽管两者在审查义务和法律激励措施上存在差异,但未来不管中国是否加入TPP,这些差异不会对我国相关立法产生直接实质性影响。On February 4, 2016, the 12 nation-party of the Trans-Pacific Partnerschip （TPP） signed formally the agreement in Ackland. By comparing with the draft of Round of Negotiations at Bandar Seri Begawan in Brunei （2013） and the draft of Round of Negotiations at Ho Chi Minh in Vietnam （2014）, which were released by WikiLeaks during the negotiations, it can be found that the final version of TPP widely accepts the ＂safe harbor＂ rules and the ＂legal incentives＂ rules, which were suggested by US proposal （2011）. The paper draws the conclusion that no matter whether China joins TPP in the future or not, the rules of ISP liability in TPP will not directly impact the Chinese law, although they have differences in monitoring responsibility and legal incentives.

关 键 词：TPP安全港 审查义务 法律激励 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]