检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严兴亚[1] 陈然[1] 吕鸿燕[1] 李凤[1] 张勇[1] 谭守文[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学附属六安医院神经内科三病区,安徽六安237005
出 处:《中风与神经疾病杂志》2016年第12期1118-1121,共4页Journal of Apoplexy and Nervous Diseases
摘 要:目的:探究急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓前基于Dragon评分对患者14 d结局的预测作用。方法回顾性分析60例接受静脉溶栓[阿替普酶( r-tPA)]的急性脑梗死患者,依据溶栓前的Dragon评分将患者分为3组:A组(评分小于等于3分)、B组(评分等于4分)和C组(评分大于等于5分),比较3组患者的近期(14 d)预后。依据14 d的临床疗效分为优效组和非优效组,采用Logistic回归模型分析Dragon评分对患者14 d结局的预测作用。结果 A组优效率为65.2%、B组为优效率66.7%、C组优效率27.3%,经χ2检验,A、B之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A、C组和B、C组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且C组的治愈和显效病例评分为5分、6分和7分的例均无好的结局。溶栓后14 d 3组颅内出血转化之间差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。二元Logistic回归分析显示Dragon评分与缺血性卒中溶栓患者的优效率有相关性(OR=0.566,95%Cl 0.356~0.900,P=0.016)。结论溶栓前Dragon评分小于5分的急性缺血性卒中患者,具有更加良好的近期(14 d)预后。Objective To evaluate the Dragon score in predicting the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke ( AIS) pa-tients with intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) at 14 days.Methods The data of all 60 patients who had received intravenous thrombolytic therapy were retrospectively analyzed .Patients were classified into 3 groups based on the Dragon score:group A (score≤3),group B(score=4)and group C(score≥5).Short-term prognosis of thrombolysis were compared among 3 groups.Patients were classified into 2 groups based on the excellent efficiency or non-excellent efficiency at day 14 after thrombolysis .The correlation between Dragon score and Short-term prognosis of thrombolysis was analyzed by logistic regression analysis .Results Excellent efficiency of A group was 65.2%,B group was 66.7%,C group was 27.3%.No difference was found between A and B groups (P〉0.05).But the excellent efficiency of group A was significantly higher than that of group C , and group B was significantly higher than that of group C ( P〈0.05).In addition,Patients in less than 5 points of Dragon scores were significantly higher than that of 6 points and 7 points,in group C.14 days after thrombolysis therapy .The intracranial hemorrhage rate of 3 groups were no statistically sig-nificant differences (P=1.000).Logistic regression analysis revealed that Dragon score was significantly associated with fa -vorable prognosis at day 14 after thrombolysis (OR=0.566,95%Cl 0.356 ~0.900,P=0.016).Conclusion Before thrombolysis therapy ,patients in less than 5 points of Dragon scores have a favorable prognosis at day 14 .
关 键 词:Dragon评分 急性缺血性卒中 阿替普酶(r-tPA) 静脉溶栓 短期预后 优效
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222