检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]佳木斯大学附属第一医院呼吸内科,黑龙江佳木斯154003
出 处:《微量元素与健康研究》2017年第1期6-7,9,共3页Studies of Trace Elements and Health
基 金:黑龙江省自然科学基金项目(H201370);佳木斯大学研究生科技创新项目(LZZ2015-015)
摘 要:目的:探究肺源性心脏病患者经超声雾化吸入及机械辅助排痰治疗后实施护理干预的临床效果。方法:选取老年肺心病患者96例,随机分为雾化组、对照组各48例;对照组进行常规治疗,治疗组在常规治疗基础上加雾化吸入及机械辅助排痰,并配合护理干预,对两组患者治疗过程与结果进行观察比较。结果:雾化组在呼吸困难缓解时间、肺部口罗音消失时间及水肿消退时间均优于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:使用超声雾化吸入及机械辅助排痰结合综合护理干预措施治疗肺心病急性加重期,缩短了疗程,是治疗急性加重期肺心病的有效方法。Objective:To study the clinical effect and nursing point,of ultrasonic atomization inhalation and mechanical assisted expectorationnursing intervention in treatment of the acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary heart disease. Methods: 96 cases of patients with chronic pulmonary heart disease were randomly divided into atomization group( n = 48) and control group( n = 48). Control group were given routine treatment,the atomization group on the basis of conventional therapy were given atomization inhalation,mechanical assisted expectoration and cooperate with nursing intervention. The treatment process and result of two group,were compared. Results: The dyspnea relieve time,the lung sound disappear time,and the edema relieve time of atomization group were superior to control group,the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 01). Conclusion: The ultrasonic atomization inhalation and mechanical assisted expectoration combined with the comprehensive nursing intervention measures is effective method in the treatment of chronic pulmonary heart disease,which directly shorten the period of treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117