检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘芳腾 朱培谦[1] 欧阳喜[1] 夏广丰 邱铖 罗洪亮[1]
出 处:《中华普通外科杂志》2017年第1期67-72,共6页Chinese Journal of General Surgery
摘 要:目的从循证医学角度系统评价全腹腔镜下三角吻合(intracorporeal Billroth I anastomosis,ICBI)治疗胃癌的有效性、安全性及近期疗效。方法检索收集截止至2015年11月发表的比较ICBI和腹腔镜辅助毕I式吻合术(extracorporeal Billroth I anastomosis,ECBI)治疗胃癌的中、英文文献,利用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入11篇文献,共计2020例胃癌患者,其中ECBI组1169例,ICBI组851例。Meta分析结果显示,与ECBI组相比,ICBI组在手术时间、切缘距离以及术后总体并发症、吻合口相关并发症方面相比差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。但ICBI组的术中出血量较ECBI组减少,淋巴结清扫数目更多,术后胃肠道功能恢复更快,使用止痛药次数更少,住院时间更短(均P〈0.05)。结论ICBI治疗胃癌是安全有效的,具有良好的近期疗效。Objective systematically evaluate the efficacy, safety and recent curative effects of deha-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy ( ICBI ) for gastric carcinoma. Methods Literatures in English and Chinese comparing ECBI and ICBI published up to November 2015 were searched from international and national online databases. Meta-analysis was conducted by Review Manager 5.3 soft ware. Results There are eleven studies involved, with 2020 gastric cancer patients, including, 1 169 ECBI cases and 851 ICBI cases. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant statistical differences between ECBI group and ICBI group in operative time, resection margin length, overall postoperative complications and anastomosis-related complications. ( all P 〉 0. 05 ). When compared to ECBI, the estimated blood loss was significantly less in ICBI, and ICBI with more retrieved lymph nodes, faster recovery of gastrointestinal function, less use of painkiller and shorter postoperative hospital stay ( all P 〈 0.05). Conclusion ICBI is safe and feasible in treatment of gastric cancer, and has a good short-term effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.73.33