检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:奚丹[1] 裴红雷 顾文栋[1] 黄瑾[1] 宁忠华[1] 徐国平[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省常州市第一人民医院放疗科,江苏常州213003
出 处:《医学临床研究》2016年第12期2377-2379,2382,共4页Journal of Clinical Research
摘 要:【目的】探讨直肠癌术后容积旋转调强(VMAT)和三维适形放疗(3DCRT)的剂量和疗效。【方法】本院接受直肠癌手术的80例患者,根据术后放疗计划的不同随机分为A,B两组,A组给予术后VMAT放疗计划,B组给予3DCRT放疗计划,比较两组放疗剂量、治疗效果以及副作用。【结果】A组最大吸收剂量(Dmax)、平均吸收剂量(Dmean)、最小吸收剂量(Dmin)和剂量均勺指数(HT、照著低于B组,靶区剂量适形度指数(CI)显著高于B组,且差异有显著性(P〈0.01),而两组95%体积受照射剂量(V95%)差异无显著性(P〉0.05);A组在小肠、膀胱的Dmax、Dmean、50%体积受照射剂量(V50)值,左、右股骨头Dmean。值上与B组比较差异具有显著性(P〈0.01);A组治疗时间显著短于B组,机器调数显著低于B组(P〈0.01);A组总缓解率70%,而B组则为65%,两组相比较差异无显著性(P〉0.05);A组总不良反应率为52.5%,显著低于B组的75%(P〈0.05)。【结论】直肠癌术后放疗治疗过程中,VMAT和3DCRT效果均较显著,但VMAT放疗更具计量学上精准、毒副作用小、治疗时间短的优势,临床治疗意义显著。[Objective]To explore the differences in dose, curative rates, and side effects between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) after rectal cancer operation. [Methods]Eighty patients with rectal cancer who underwent operation in our hospital were randomly divided into the VMAT group (A) and 3DCRT group (B) according to different postoperative radiotherapy plans. The dose, curative rates, and side effects of radiotherapy were compared between the two groups. [Results]The values of Dmax, Dmean, Dmin, and HI (hompgenecity Index) in the A group were significantly lower than those in the B group, while the value of CI (Conformity Index) was significantly higher ( P 〈0.01). The difference in V95% between the two groups was not significant (P 〉0.05). There were significant differences in the values of Dmax, Dmean, and V50 in the small intestine and bladder between the two groups( P 〈0.01), the Dmean values in the left and right femoral heads also showed significant differences( P 〈0.01). The treatment time of group A was significantly shorter than that of group B and the hop count of body was significantly lower than that of group B ( P〈 0.01). The total remission rate in group A was 70%, while in group B was 65% ( P 〉0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in group A (52.5 %) was significantly lower than that in group B (75 % ) ( P 〈0.05). [Conclusion] During the process of radiotherapy after rectal cancer operation, the effects of both VMAT and 3DCRT are signifi- cant. However, the former is more consistent with metrology, and side effects are few, with short treatment time. It is of clinical significance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.78