《毛传》《郑笺》语法分析比较研究  

A Comparative Study on Grammatical Analysis of "Maos' Poems" and "Zheng's Comments on Maos' Poems"

作　　者：华敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国传媒大学南广学院,江苏南京211172

出　　处：《大庆师范学院学报》2017年第1期74-80,共7页Journal of Daqing Normal University

摘　　要：在我国古代典籍中,涉及语法问题的论述早就已经存在,不过这些语法分析往往散见于各种训诂学著作之中,没有明确的语法体系,除极个别的名称外,基本上也没有语法术语。《毛传》和《郑笺》中存在大量类似的语法分析,将《毛传》《郑笺》中的语法分析进行比较,发现郑玄对虚词、代词以及句法、句式等方面的认识较毛亨更为深入;同时,将两者加以比较,也可以看出部分语言现象从西汉到东汉的历时变化和发展趋势。There are many works on grammar in Chinese ancient classics,although they are all seperated in the works focusing on the meanings of ancient classic works,without any clear grammatical system or any grammatical terms except for some specific names. There are many similar grammatical analysis in ＂ Maos＇ Poems＂ and ＂ Zheng＇s Comments on Maos＇ Poems＂. After comparing the analysis,the author concludes that Zheng Xuan had a better understanding of functioanl words,pronouns,syntax and sentence patterns than Mao Heng. Besides,people could also see clearly the change and developing trend of language from the West Han Dynasty to the East Han Dynasty.

关 键 词：语法分析 《毛传》 《郑笺》 

分 类 号：H141[语言文字—汉语]