检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:南方[1]
出 处:《北京社会科学》2017年第1期74-80,共7页Social Sciences of Beijing
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目(10JZD0044)
摘 要:根据25位童年曾有留守或流动经历的90后农民工的口述史资料,考察农民工家庭对子女抚育策略的决策机制。研究发现,子女需求的变化是引起家庭策略变化的诱因,其中以教育需求变化最为明显。父母能否调动足够的资源满足子女变化的需求,是家庭策略发生变化的重要影响因素。长期亲子离散的家庭结构,削弱了父母对子女决策的权威,子女在家庭事务中的话语权随之有较大提升,子女在家庭决策中开始扮演愈加重要的角色。研究也发现,农民工在城市的"非市民"待遇,使每位农民工父母决策时都面临着来自于歧视性制度和匮乏的公共政策资源的巨大压力,使得每个农民工家庭的选择都极为有限且相似,带有深刻的时代局限性。Based on the materials of oral investigation on 25 young migrant workers having the experience of left behind or city immigration childhood,this paper analyzes migrant families’ decision making process and the key influence factors on their arrangement for Children’s caring and education. It argues that the turning point of family strategy is the conflict between the demand of children development and the limited family resource. With the decreased control by parents who do not live together with,juveniles play dominant role as the adult and replace their parents to make decision for themselves. It concludes that migrant families do not have more choices to provide better caring and education arrangement for their children left behind or migrant in cities because of the limited public resource and social welfare supplement caused by the urban-rural dual system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42