检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:连园园[1,2,3] 梁鲁宁[4] 刘建伟[1,2,3] Lian Yuanyuan Liang Luning Liu Jianwei(2011 Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization, Beijing, 100088, PR China Key Laboratory of Evidence Science (China University of Political Science and Law), Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100088 Fada Institute of Forensic Medicine & Science, Beoing, 100192 Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing, 100038)
机构地区:[1]2011司法文明协同创新中心,北京100088 [2]教育部重点实验室(中国政法大学),北京100088 [3]法大法庭科学技术鉴定研究所,北京100192 [4]公安部物证鉴定中心,北京100038
出 处:《证据科学》2016年第6期758-768,共11页Evidence Science
基 金:中国政法大学青年项目(1000-10816338);中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队资助项目(1000-10814344)
摘 要:文件形成时间鉴定是判断文件真伪的重要途径。文件形成时间鉴定可通过三个技术通道来完成,即墨迹(包括印文印迹)的形成时间、纸制品的形成时间及文件内容的系统性分析。其中以墨迹的书写时间鉴定最为普遍。所以本文选取墨迹的形成时间鉴定技术作为评析重点,系统分析了半个多世纪以来涌现出来的众多墨迹形成时间鉴定的相关技术,并对其具体方法进行了归纳总结和简单的评析。本文在回顾历史、总结现在的基础上,提出了文件形成时间鉴定在未来发展的方向。Dating is an important approach to identify the authenticity of documents. There are three methods of dating, i.e. dating the inks of the document (including the seals), dating the paper products and systematic analysis of contents of the document. The most common way in practice is dating inks of documents. Therefore, this article focused mainly on the techniques of dating inks of document, and analyzed systematically the technologies about dating inks of documents emerged over the past half-a-century, and also summarized and simply evaluated on these specific methods. Based on review of the history and the current situation, this article proposed the direction of future development on dating of documents..
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185