“民族形式”论争中的陪都地方戏批评——基于《新蜀报》有关史料的考察  

Criticism on Local Operas in the Debate of "National Style":A Study Based on Materials from the New Shu Daily

作　　者：张志全[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆工商大学文学与新闻学院

出　　处：《戏剧艺术》2017年第1期112-121,共10页Theatre Arts

基　　金：重庆市教委人文社会科学研究项目<抗战时期重庆及西南地区戏曲发展研究>(项目编号:12SKH15)阶段性成果

摘　　要：抗战时期,文艺界掀起了关于"民族形式"的论争。论争范围由文学扩展到戏剧、木刻等艺术领域。在此背景下,以"旧剧改革"为主要内容的抗战地方戏批评逐渐在陪都戏剧界展开。随着讨论的深入,批评界较早地对戏曲的本质、地方戏的起源与发展等问题进行了考察,这是陪都"民族形式"论争的"意外收获",对于我们认识地方戏的价值、梳理地方戏的源流,乃至追溯中国戏曲的起源等问题有着不容忽视的理论意义。During the Anti-Japanese period, there was a debate from literature and theatre to woodcut and other artistic forms. operas featuring the ＂reformation of traditional drama＂ began to development of the debate, critics launched early discussions of ＂national style＂ which extended During that time, criticism of local rise in the wartime capital. With the of the nature of Chinese Xiqu, the origins of local operas and the development of opera, which was a ＂by product＂ of the debate in the wartime capital. The discussions were helpful to the evaluation of the local operas and recognition of the origins of local, and even Chinese Xiqu.

关 键 词：民族形式 抗战 陪都 地方戏批评 

分 类 号：J80[艺术—戏剧戏曲]