论《消散》和《最蓝的眼睛》中精神殖民的异同  

A Comparative Study of Spiritual Colonization in “Disappearance” and “The Bluest Eye”

作　　者：刘晶[1] 胡宗锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北大学外国语学院,陕西西安710127

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2017年第2期87-91,共5页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：戴维·达比丁的《消散》记述了年轻的圭亚那工程师和英国房东卢瑟福太太的对话,从中折射出殖民统治给殖民者和被殖民者带来的巨大影响。托妮·莫里森的《最蓝的眼睛》讲述了黑人小女孩佩科拉渴望拥有白人的蓝眼睛的悲剧故事,展现了殖民统治对被殖民的黑人造成的精神伤害。现有研究多是从后殖民主义角度解读《最蓝的眼睛》,但是鲜有对《消散》的研究,更没有对两部作品的比较研究。虽然《消散》和《最蓝的眼睛》都是叙述精神殖民的影响,但是它们既有共同点也有不同点。文章对两部作品进行比较研究,分析其中体现的精神殖民的异同,旨在探究作品中蕴含的后殖民主题。＂ Disappearance＂, by David Dabydeen, is about the dialogues between me young Guiana engineer and British landlord--Mrs. Rutherford, from which the impact of col- onization on the colonizer and the colonized is reflected. ＂The Bluest Eye＂,by Toni Morrison, tells a tragic story of the little black girl--Pecola who is eager to have bluest eyes, which reflects the mental injury of colonization on the black people. ＂The Bluest Eye＂ is mostly studied from postcolonial perspective. Comparatively, ＂ Disappearance ＂ is rarely studied,let alone a comparative study on the two novels. Although the impact of spiritual colonization is showed in those two novels,there are similarities and differences. Comparing the two novels, the similarities and differences are analyzed in terms of spiritual colonization. It aims to study the postcolonial theme in the novels.

关 键 词：《消散》 《最蓝的眼睛》 精神殖民 后殖民主题 

分 类 号：I106.4[文学—世界文学]