不同艾灸时程对原发性痛经的临床研究  

Clinical Research on Different Time of Moxibustion for Primary Dysmenorrhea

作　　者：汪军 毛珍[2] 阿力木.玉努斯 

机构地区：[1]新疆克拉玛依市白碱滩区第一社区卫生服务中心,新疆克拉玛依834000 [2]湖北中医药大学,湖北武汉430060

出　　处：《针灸临床杂志》2017年第1期1-4,共4页Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion

基　　金：国家"十二五"科技支撑计划项目;编号:2012BAI24B01

摘　　要：目的:观察不同艾灸时程治疗原发性痛经的临床疗效。方法:将60例患者随机分成3组,每组20例,均选用纯艾条灸法,A组灸10 min,B组灸20 min,C组灸30 min,观察治疗前后痛经临床症状评分、血清PGE_2(前列腺素E_2)、PGF_(2α)(前列腺素F_(2α))、β-EP(β内啡肽)含量及变化。结果:与A组治疗后比较,C组痛经症状得分及血清PGE2,PGF2α含量变化差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),A组与B组比较,B组与C组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);3组临床疗效比较,差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:艾灸灸治时间与原发性痛经的疗效呈正相关,30 min能取得比较理想的疗效。Objective： To observe the clinical efficacy of different time of moxibustion for primary dysmenorrhea. Methods： 60 patients with primary dysmenorrhea were randomized into three groups,with 20 patients in each group. All groups were intervened by moxibustion. Group A was intervened for 10 min; Group B was intervened for 20 min; Group C was intervened for 30 min. The changes of clinical symptom scores,the levels of PGE2,PGF2α,β- EP before and after treatment were observed. Results： The scores of clinical symptom in Group C compared with those in Group A had a difference（ P〈0. 05）. While compared between Group B and Group C and compared between Group B and Group A,there was no difference（ P〈0. 05）; the clinical efficacy of three groups was not different（ P〉0. 05）. Conclusion： The moxibustion is a good therapy. In the same condition,the longer tiune it uses,the better curative effect it will have.

关 键 词：艾灸法 原发性痛经 CMSS评分 PGE2 PGF2Α Β-EP 

分 类 号：R246.3[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]