检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武警四川总队医院放射科,乐山614000 [2]武警总医院医务部,北京100039
出 处:《武警医学》2017年第1期64-67,共4页Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
摘 要:目的探讨扩散加权成像(diffusion weighted imaging,DWI)表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)及相对表观扩散系数(relative apparent diffusion coefficient,rADC)测定对直肠癌周围淋巴结定性诊断的价值。方法 68例经肠镜诊断的直肠癌患者行常规MRI及DWI扫描,测定直肠癌区域淋巴结的ADC值,并计算rADC值。对良性增生、转移淋巴结ADC值及rADC值进行相关性分析。结果依照手术病理结果,入组良性增生组共12个,转移组共18个。良性增生组ADC值为(1.0513±0.1284)×10^(-3)mm^2/s,rADC值为0.8756±0.1197;转移组ADC值为(0.8957±0.1608)×10^(-3)mm^2/s,rADC值为0.6832±0.1488,两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=7.858,P=0.009;F=13.974,P=0.001)。把良恶性淋巴结作为变量检验ADC值和rADC值并绘制受试者工作特性曲线(ROC),ADC值为检验变量时,ROC曲线下面积为0.769,诊断价值中等,以0.9682为阈值,其敏感度为75.0%,特异度为67.3%。以rADC值为检验变量,ROC曲线下面积为0.824,较ADC值ROC曲线下面积大,诊断价值中等,以0.7666为阈值,其敏感度91.7%,特异度73.2%。结论 ADC值及rADC值的测量对直肠癌周围区域淋巴结的良恶性鉴别有一定的诊断意义。Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient( ADC) and relative apparent diffusion coefficient( rADC) values for determining periphery benign and malignant lymph nodes of rectal cancer. Methods Sixty-eight patients with rectal cancer confirmed by colonoscopy underwent routine MRI and DWI. The ADC values of lymph nodes of rectal cancer were measured and the rADC values were calculated. The correlation of ADC values and rADC values between benign and malignant lymph nodes was analyzed. Results According to pathological results,there were 12 benign lymph nodes and 18 malignant lymph nodes. The values of ADC and rADC of benign group were( 1. 0513 ± 0. 1284) × 10^(-3)mm^2/ s and 0. 8756 ± 0. 1197 respectively,butwere( 0. 8957 ± 0. 1608) × 10^(-3)mm^2/ s and 0. 6832 ± 0. 1488 respectively in malignant group. There was significant difference( F =7. 858,P = 0. 009; F = 13. 974,P = 0. 001) between the two groups. The ROC curve was used to determine ADC and rADC values with lymph nodes as the test variable. When ADC served as a variable value,the AZ area under the ROC curve was 0. 769,sensitivity was75% and specificity was 67. 3%,all of which were of moderate diagnostic value. When rADC served as the test variable,the area under the ROC curve was 0. 824,sensitivity was 91. 7%,and specificity was 73. 2%,which were higher than those of ADC,but still of moderate diagnostic value. Conclusions ADC values and rADC values are correlated with the benign or malignant pathologic result of lymph nodes of rectal cancer,which can help to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30