清宫表预测胎儿性别的能力分析  

Analysis of Qing-gong Table to Predict Fetal Sex

作　　者：郭晋敏[1] 张莉[1] 徐建江[1] 康长清[1] 

机构地区：[1]济南军区总医院药剂科,山东济南250031

出　　处：《中国社会医学杂志》2017年第1期101-103,共3页Chinese Journal of Social Medicine

摘　　要：目的分析清宫表预测胎儿性别的能力以及作为选择性生育指标的可行性。方法收集2013年12月1日—2014年12月31日住院的符合纳入标准的产科患者107例,通过受孕月份和孕妇农历年龄,推算出清宫表中的预计胎儿性别。根据胎儿真实性别等数据,分析清宫表预测生男生女的准确度和精确度。结果清宫表作为胎儿性别的预测指标,其准确度和精确度均不足50%。在不同排卵月份的情况下,清宫表的预测准确率为36.6%~66.7%,不同月份之间预测准确率无差异。在不同母亲年龄情况下,清宫表的预测准确率亦无差异(39.1%~41.9%)。而母亲分娩第2胎时,清宫表的准确率(56.7%)明显高于第1胎及第3~5胎。结论清宫表预测胎儿性别尚缺乏科学依据,预测能力差。Objectives To evaluate the ability of Qing-gong table to predict fetal sex and the feasibility of selective fertility index.Methods The data of 107 obstetric patients in line with the standard of admission were collected,with hospitalization time from 2014 Dec.31to 2013 Dec.1.By conception month and the age of pregnant women,the expected sex of the fetus was calculated by Qing-gong table.According to the data of fetal real sex and so on,accuracy and precision of Qing-gong table in predicting fetal sex were analyzed.Results The predicting accuracy and precision rate of Qing-gong table in predicting fetal sex were less than 50%.In different ovulation month,the accuracy and precision of the Qing-gong table was 36.6%-66.7%,and no differences were found.In different age group of pregnant women,no differences were found in the accuracy rate（39.1%-41.9%）.When mothers were having the second birth,the accuracy rate（56.7%）was more than first fetal and fetal 3-5.Conclusions The ability of Qinggong table in predicting fetal sex lacks scientific basis with poor predictive power.

关 键 词：清宫表 胎儿性别 预测 

分 类 号：R173[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]