检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史瑞[1] 张雅敏[1] 许洋[2] 崔子林[1] 刘子荣[1] 潘澄[1] 邓永林[1] 郑虹[1] 沈中阳[1]
机构地区:[1]天津市第一中心医院器官移植中心,天津市300192 [2]天津医科大学一中心临床学院
出 处:《中华肝胆外科杂志》2017年第2期87-89,共3页Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81370576);天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划(14JCYBJC24800)
摘 要:目的比较直接肝移植和挽救性肝移植治疗原发性肝癌的长期预后,分析挽救性肝移植策略的可行性。方法回顾性分析2005年6月至2015年3月天津市第一中心医院移植中心收治的1420例原发性肝癌肝移植患者的临床资料,其中挽救性肝移植患者170例,直接肝移植患者1250例。比较两组患者的生存曲线及术后1、3、5年生存率。结果直接肝移植术后1、3、5年生存率分别为77.2%、59.4%、54.6%,挽救性肝移植术后1、3、5年生存率分别为70.3%、48.1%、41.8%。两组1、3、5年生存率差异具有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论挽救性肝移植组患者术后长期生存率略低于直接肝移植组,但是作为复发性肝癌的主要治疗手段之一仍是可行的。Objective To compare long-term outcome of primary liver transplantation and salvage liver transplantation in treating patients with primary liver cancer, and discuss the clinical feasibility of salvage liver transplantation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1 420 patients with primary liver cancer, including 170 cases treated with salvage liver transplantation and 1 250 cases with direct liver transplantation from Transplantation Center of Tianjin First Center Hospital between June 2005 and March 2015. The survival curve and 1, 3, 5-year survival rates were also compared between the two groups. Results Postoperative 1, 3, 5-year survival rates were 77.2%, 59.4%, 54.6% in the primary liver transplantation group and 70.3 %, 48.1% , 41.8% in the salvage liver transplantation group, respectively. Significant statistical differences were observed ( all P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions Salvage liver transplantation resuited in lower long-term survival rates in salvage liver transplantation than primary liver transplantation. Nevertheless, as one of the major treatment options, salvage liver transplantation is feasible for patients with recurrent liver cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43