检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]睢宁县人民医院消化内科,江苏徐州221200
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第36期76-78,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探索内镜下应用医用胶喷洒止血治疗消化性溃疡并出血的疗效。方法选取46例消化性溃疡并出血患者随机分成两组,观察组采取内镜下应用医用胶喷洒止血,对照组采用内镜下注射肾上腺素止血,比较止血效果;1个月后随访统计再出血情况。结果观察组显效14例,有效8例,无效1例;对照组显效15例,有效7例,无效1例,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。1个月后随访,观察组、对照组均有1例再次出血,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论内镜下应用医用胶喷洒止血治疗消化性溃疡并出血与传统的镜下局部注射肾上腺素效果相仿。Objective To explore the endoscopic application of medical glue spraying hemostatic efficacy for the treatment of peptic ulcer and bleeding. Methods 46 patients with peptic ulcer and bleeding were randomly divided into two groups, observation group to endoscopic spray application of medical glue hemostasis, the control group using endoscopic hemostatic epinephrine injection, compare the hemostatic effect. Statistical bleeding again after 1 month of follow-up. Results The observation group of 14 caseshad marked effect, 8 cases effectively, 1 had no effect. The control group, 15 cases were markedly improved effectively in 7 cases, 1 had no effect, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P〉0.05). After 1 month of follow-up, the observation group and control group were 1 case of bleeding again, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P〉0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic spray application of medical glue hemostatic treatment of peptic ulcer and bleeding with the traditional microscopic effect of local injection of epinephrine is similar, is worth further large sample research and gradually popularized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68