检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳市第五人民医院肿瘤外一科,辽宁沈阳110023 [2]辽宁中医药大学附属三院麻醉科,辽宁沈阳110020
出 处:《中国医药指南》2017年第5期142-143,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨采用不同术式治疗肠癌肠梗阻患者的临床疗效。方法收集2011年6月至2013年6月间我院收治的肠癌并发肠梗阻患者的临床资料,共50例。回顾性分析采用不同手术方式治疗的患者的治愈率及1、3年生存率。结果四种术式治疗有效率见比较差异无统计学意义,术后生存率比较差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论结肠癌肠梗阻的手术方式可以依据具体情况做出选择,各术式之间差异不显著,均可广泛运用到临床。Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of different surgical treatment of colorectal cancer patients with intestinal obstruction. Methods From June 2011 to June 2013 intestinal cancer in our hospital clinical data of patients with intestinal obstruction, a total of 50 cases. A retrospective analysis was performed using different surgical methods of treatment and cure rate of patients lyear, 3 years survival rate. Results Four kinds of surgical treatment efficiency see the difference was not statistically significant, survival rate difference not statistically significant (P〉0.05). Conclusion Colon obstruction surgical case selection may be made based on the specific differences between the various surgical procedures is not significant, and can be widely applied to clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249