检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:文守琴[1] 孟宪东[1] 陈娟[1] 卓俞 代胜盈
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西医院心理卫生中心,四川成都610041
出 处:《四川医学》2017年第2期151-155,共5页Sichuan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的对比患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)与抑郁自评量表(SDS)对急诊待床入院患者抑郁筛查的敏感性。方法选取急诊科待床入院患者106例,同时使用PHQ-9量表及SDS量表进行评估,将两者评估结果进行比较。结果PHQ-9量表及SDS量表对急诊待床入院患者的抑郁检出率分别为45.3%及25.5%,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。两种量表对不同性别、不同婚姻状况、不同文化程度、不同职业、不同经济收入患者的抑郁检出率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在对急诊待床入院患者抑郁筛查中,PHQ-9相对于SDS敏感性更高。Objective To compare the sensitivity of the patients health questionnaire with Depression Scale(PHQ-9) and the Self rating Depression Scale(SDS) to the patients with depression in emergency department waiting for hospital admission.Methods 106 patients in emergency department waiting for hospital admission were selected,and the PHQ-9 scale and SDS scale were used to evaluate the results. Both assessment results were compared. Results PHQ-9 scale and SDS scale on the detection rate of depression in patients in emergency department waiting for hospital admission were respectively 45. 3% and 25. 5%,and the difference was statistically significant( P = 0. 003).The detection rate of depression of the two scales for patients with different gender,different marital status,different educational level,different occupations,and different economic income was statistically significant difference( P〈0. 05).Conclusion PHQ-9 is more sensitive than SDS in screening for depression in patients in emergency department waiting for hospital admission.
关 键 词:抑郁障碍 患者健康问卷抑郁量表 抑郁自评量表 急诊待床入院
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.237.222