检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,上海201804
出 处:《交通运输系统工程与信息》2017年第1期176-182,共7页Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51478350)~~
摘 要:基于社会整合的视角,在大规模城市更新背景下,本文选择上海市郊区顾村和中心城以内大华一村两个动迁安置房社区,利用时间分配调查数据,对不同区位、不同住房取得类型的通勤者生活时间分配进行了对比分析、差异检验和生活活动参与程度等级评价.结果表明,两个区位整体通勤者的生活时间分配特征差异不明显,但是在细分住房取得类型情况下,不同群体,以及不同区位之间的差异显著.特别地,郊区顾村的市政动迁通勤者的通勤时耗最长,但是户外休闲活动参与度仍然为高水平.分析表明,居住区附近的公共设施开发和地铁的可达性在一定程度上满足了户外休闲活动的需求.Based on the perspective of social inclusion, and under the environment of urban renewal, this paper selects two residential zones in Shanghai, of which Gucun is located in the suburb and Dahua in urban area.Using a time use survey data, the time use patterns of commuters are compared, difference tested according to residential zones and groups classified by different house acquisition types, and the activity participation level are evaluated for each group.The results show that the difference of time use characteristics is not obvious between two whole residential zones, however, when house acquisition type is distinguished the difference among groups appears significant.In particular, the commuters who relocated from city in Gucun suffer the most commuting duration, while they still participate in out-of-home recreation activities by high level, and further analysis indicate that the development of public facilities near the residential zone and the accessibility of the subway support the demand of out-of-home recreation activities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.7.195