客观性的悖论与话语权力的博弈——论现实主义无法回避的现实  

Game Theory between Objectivity Paradox and Discourse Power:On the Inevitable Reality of Realism

作　　者：路遥[1] 王耿[2] 

机构地区：[1]太原师范学院文学院,山西太原030619 [2]南京大学文学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第2期34-42,共9页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"大众文化与文学生产的关系研究(1990年代以来)"(15BZW008)

摘　　要：作为文艺理论的现实主义百年来在中国走过了坎坷的历程,曾经被奉为圭臬,如今却遭遇冷淡,何以至此?文章从现实主义文艺思潮和美学范型两个范畴,剖析其中复杂的内涵与外延。现实主义的美学范型其实是存在"悖论"的,它被裹挟进现实主义文艺思潮后,话语背后的权力博弈更徒增了现实主义的种种尴尬,确实是剪不断理还乱,让人厌倦。新时期以来又遭到了现代主义的挑战,表面上似乎该和现实主义的"话语纠缠"说再见了,然而受制于认识的进化,在相当长的历史时期内现实主义不可能也不会离开我们。As a literary theory, the realism has gone through ups and downs in the past hundred years in China, and it used to be regarded as a standard, but nowadays it has to bear the indifference, why.9 This paper analyzes the complex intension and extension from such two categories as literary thought and aesthetic paradigm. In fact, there is a ＂paradox＂ in the aesthetic paradigm of realism, and after it was coerced into the reality of literary thought, the power game behind the discourse has even increased the embarrassment of realism, which is boring and too much to handle. Since the new period, it has been challenged by modernism, and from what it looks like, it seems that we should say goodbye to the ＂discourse entanglement＂ of realism, however, restricted to the evolution of cognition, it is impossible for realism to be away from us in a fairly long period of time.

关 键 词：现实主义 文艺思潮 美学范型 客观性 话语权 

分 类 号：I022[文学—文学理论]