检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁桂凤[1] 张璐[1,2] 张雅薇[1] 杨森[1] 古纯文 DING Gui-Feng ZHANG Lu ZHANG Ya-Wei YANG Sen GU Chun-Wen(Institute of Psychological and Behavioral, Henan University, Kaifeug 475004, Henan Province, China The Human Resource De- partment, Furen Pharmaceutical Group, Zhengzhou 450000, China)
机构地区:[1]河南大学心理与行为研究所,河南开封475004 [2]辅仁药业集团人力资源部,郑州450000
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2017年第3期247-251,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71171073)
摘 要:目的:编制我国文化背景下上级不当督导行为量表(ASBSS),并检验其效度和信度。方法:结合文献分析与32名企业员工的开放式问卷调查,构建了ASBSS的理论维度,并在此基础上编制初始问卷。选取200名企业员工,对于初始问卷进行条目分析。选取445名企业员工,将其分为样本1(n=223)和样本2(n=222),样本1用于探索性因子分析,样本2用于验证性因子分析及信度分析,两周后用样本2进行重测。结果:量表包含11个条目,分为忽视诋毁、蓄意阻挠及苛责下属3个因子,解释总变异的66.25%;量表具有良好的结构效度(RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.94,NFI=0.92,CFI=0.96,IFI=0.96)。总量表及3个因子的内部一致性Cronbach α系数分别为0.87、0.79、0.78和0.76;重测信度分别为0.85、0.80、076和0.82。结论:本研究编制的上级不当督导行为量表信效度达到了测量学的要求,可以用来测量中国文化背景下上级的不当督导行为。Objective: To develop the Abusive Behavior Scale for Superiors under the Chinese context (ABSSC) and test its validity and reliability. Methods: Based on literature analysis and the open questionnaire survey in 32 employees, this study defined the construct of ASBSS, and compiled the preliminary questionnaire. A sample of 200 employees coming from companies was selected for item analysis. A sample of 445 employees was investigated with this questionnaire, 223 of them were assessed for exploratory factor analysis and 222 of them were assessed for confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency test with 2 week interval. Results: The ABSSC consisted of 11 items in 3 factors, which were neglect and slander, obstructionism and hard on subordinates. The 3 factors explained 55.45% of the total variance. Furthermore, the result of CFA indicated that the model fitted the data with well construct validity ( RMSEA = 0. 06, GFI = 0. 94, NFI = 0.92, CFI = 0. 96, IFI = 0. 96). The Cronbach a coefficient of the whole scale and its three facts were 0. 87, 0. 79, 0. 78, and 0. 76, respectively. Conclusion: It suggests that the Abusive Behavior Scale for superiors under the Chinese context (ABSSC) is reliable and valid enough to be applicable to measure superiors abusive behavior under the background of Chinese culture.
分 类 号:C933[经济管理—管理学] B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177