外国民事执行体制的研究与借鉴  

The Research and Reference of Foreign Civil Enforcement System

作　　者：刘萍[1] 赵岑[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350

出　　处：《天津法学》2017年第1期68-75,共8页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：对生效民事判决的执行是民事司法程序中的一个重要环节,其关系到民事司法秩序的稳定和当事人民事权益的最终实现,在各国民事执行体制问题均受到重视。对英国、德国、法国的执行体制进行简要的介绍,这些国家在执行主体、债务人信息获取、当事人权利救济等方面都作出了规定,以此来促进执行问题的解决;此外,还要在研究外国执行体制的基础上对我国的执行制度进行思考,与其他国家相比,我国的执行问题更加突出,现实中出现了"执行难"等问题,在新一轮的司法改革中,执行体制的改革也是其中的重要组成部分。我国正在进行以"审执分离"为基础的执行改革,并且在一些具体的问题上还需要进一步的修改和完善,对外国制度的研究将对我国执行体制的改革起到一定的借鉴意义。Enforcing the civil judgment is an important part of civil procedure. It relates to the stability of the civil judicial order and the civil rights of citizens. Other countries pay much attention to the problems of civil enforcement. The main content of this paper is to introduce the civil enforcement system of UK, Germany, and France. These countries have already made the rules about the executive subject, the access to the debtors＇ information and the parties9 rights relief to solve the problems. In addition, we think about our countries9 civil enforcement system on the basis of researching the foreign system. Compared with other countries, China＇s executive problems become more prominent, such as the problem of being difficult to execute. In the process of the new judicial reform, the reform of the enforcement system is very important. China has been trying to sepa-rate the jurisdiction and enforcement power, however, some areas of justice still need further modifying and improving. The research of foreign enforcement system is meaningful on that perspective.

关 键 词：执行体制 审执分离 执行主体 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]