检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭令荣[1] 孟占鳌 刘卫敏[1] 康庄[1] 邹艳[1] Peng Lingrong Meng Zhan'ao Liu Weimin Kang Zhuang Zou Yah.(Department of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China)
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第三医院放射科,广州510630
出 处:《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》2016年第6期19-22,共4页Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
基 金:广东省科技计划重大专项课题(2014B02022500)
摘 要:目的初步探讨肾嗜酸细胞腺瘤(RO)和嫌色细胞癌(CCRC)的多层螺旋CT影像学特征的鉴别诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2003年6月至2015年12月我院经手术病理证实的9例肾嗜酸细胞腺瘤和12例嫌色细胞癌的患者资料,术前全部行螺旋CT平扫及三期动态增强,并分析其影像学特征。结果 3例(33.3%)RO病灶可见钙化,而1例(8.3%)CCRC病灶可见钙化,它们之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。5例(55.6%)RO病灶、1例(8.3%)CCRC病灶见星状或条索状纤维瘢痕;6例(66.7%)RO病灶、2例(16.7%)CCRC病灶出现辐轮状强化;6例(66.7%)RO病灶、2例(16.7%)CCRC病灶出现节段性强化反转,它们之间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);所有患者均未出现腹膜后淋巴结肿大。3例(33.3%)RO病灶、9例(75.0%)CCRC病灶显示均匀性强化;7例(77.8%)RO病灶、2例(16.7%)CCRC病灶显示明显强化,它们之间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CT平扫,RO病灶CT值高于CCRC病灶,CT动态增强各期相,RO病灶CT值也高于CCRC病灶。结论星状或条索状的纤维瘢痕、辐轮状强化、节段性强化反转、明显性强化更多出现在RO患者中,而均匀性强化更多出现在CCRC患者中,术前多层螺旋CT有助于鉴别RO和CCRC。Objective To compare the multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) characteristics of renal oncocytoma (RO) and chomophobe cell renal carcinoma (CRCC). Methods From June 2003 to December 2015, dinical data of 9 patients with RO and 12 patients with CRCC were studied retrospectively in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. MSCT was performed to investigate tumor imaging characteristics in plain and 3-phase dynamic enhanced scans. Results Calcifications were observed in 3 (33.3%) patients with RO and in 1 (8.3%) patients with CCRC, there was no significant difference between RO and CCRC( P〉0.05 ). five (55.6%) patients with RO had stellate or funicular scars as did one (8.3%) patient with CCRC. Spoken-wheel-like enhancement was visible in 6 (66.6%) patients with RO and in 2(16.7%) with CCRC. six (66.7%) patients with RO and 2 (16.7%) patients with CCRC showed segmental inversion. Combined evaluation of stellate or funicular scar, spoken-wheel-like enhancement, segmental enhancement inversion and obvious enhancement features had significant differences between RO and CCRC (P〈0.05). No patients with RO and CCRC had retroperitoneal lymph node enlargement. Three (33.3%) patients with RO and 9 (75.0%) patients with CCRC showed homogeneous enhancement. Seven (77.8%) patients with RO and 2 (16.7%) patients with CCRC showed obvious enhancement. There was significant difference between RO and CCRC (P〈0.05). The attenuation of RO tumors was greaterthan that of CCRC tumors on unenhanced CT. Enhancement was higher with RO than with CCRC tumors in all phases. Conclusion CT imaging features such as stellate or funicular scar, spoken-wheel-like enhancement, segmental enhancement inversion, and obvious enhancement were more common in RO, but homogeneous enhancement was more common in CCRC and they may help in differentiating RO from CCRC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.73