原旨主义、活的宪法与复杂状态下的宪法解释  

Constitutional Originalism,Living Constitution and Constitutional Interpretation in Complex Situations

作　　者：王云清[1] WANG Yun-qing

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院师资博士后科研工作流动站

出　　处：《北方法学》2017年第1期27-36,共10页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目"互联网背景下的表达权研究"(15AZD055);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"我国私法规范中的立法目的条款研究"(16YJC820021);厦门大学法学院青年教师科研基金"论立法史在法律解释中的功用";中国博士后基金第60批面上资助

摘　　要：宪法解释应该遵循原初意义还是回应时代需要,是原旨主义和"活的宪法"之争的焦点所在。在对宪法裁判进行批判与维护的过程中,原意解释方法和非原意解释方法都开始走向基础主义。两种解释方法执着于单一的理念,既无法证明自己比对方更为优秀,也未能对解释实践进行全面的描述。宪法解释是一个相当复杂、语境多元的过程,在不同复杂状况下,法官拥有不同程度的解释裁量权。有鉴于此,任何将宪法解释化约为单一解释哲学的做法,都是不恰当的。Constitutional interpretation should follow the original meaning or response to the times requirement is focus for the battle between constitutional originalism and living constitution.In the process of criticism and maintenance of the constitutional judgment,the original and the non-original intention interpretation methods are gradually moving towards the basic principles.The two interpretation methods are attached to a single idea,which can neither prove that they are superior to each other nor can fully describe the interpretative practice.The interpretation of the constitution is a rather complicated process within multiple contexts.In the complicated situation,the judges have different degrees of discretion.In view of this,it is not appropriate to simplify the interpretation of the constitution to a single interpretive philosophy.

关 键 词：原旨主义 活的宪法 宪法解释 

分 类 号：DF2[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]