责任聚合下民刑交叉案件的诉讼程序——对“先刑后民”的反思  

Study on the Cross Case Procedure from the Liabilities Combination Theory:the Reflection on the Principle of Criminal Procedure Prior to Civil Procedure

作　　者：肖建国[1] 宋春龙[1] Xiao Jianguo Song Chunlong

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《法学杂志》2017年第3期21-30,共10页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：中国人民大学科研基金研究品牌计划(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)"民事纠纷的多元化解决机制研究"(10XNI033)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在责任聚合中,因同一法律事实产生多重结果,行为主体应承担多个部门法规定的责任。民刑责任聚合是责任聚合的突出表现,为"民刑交叉"案件的一部分,但处理民刑责任聚合案件不能简单适用"先刑后民"原则。"先刑后民"的适用应满足责任主体与行为主体一致、同一法律事实以及刑事程序不以民事程序为前提三个条件。责任主体与行为主体不一致时,则应适用"民刑并存"或"先民后刑"原则,民法中的替代责任、补充责任和连带责任是这一类案件的具体体现。In the liabilities combination, the subject of act should be responsible for liabil- ities from multiple department law because the same fact may produce many results. Cross case is the highlight of liabilities combination. Although cross case liabilities combination is part of the cross case, we should not simply apply for the criminal procedure prior to civil procedure princi- ple. The apply of criminal procedure prior to civil procedure principle should meet three ele- ments. The subject of liability should be same to the subject of actor. The cross case should origi- nate from the same legal fact and the criminal case do not base on the civil procedure. When the subject of liability is not same with the subject of actor, we should apply for the parallel of the civil procedure and criminal procedure theory or the civil procedure prior to the criminal procedure theory. The substitute liability, complementary liability and joint liability in civil law are the highlights of these cases.

关 键 词：责任聚合 刑民交叉 先刑后民 替代责任 补充责任 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D925.1[政治法律—法学]