“媒体审判”辨析  

Differentiating and Analyzing about “Media Trial”

作　　者：雍自元[1] Yong Ziyuan

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学法学院,安徽芜湖241002

出　　处：《法学杂志》2017年第3期61-68,共8页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：2014年度安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目"媒体介入刑事案件审判的时度效研究"(AHSKY2014D06)的阶段性成果

摘　　要："媒体审判"指媒体事先报道和评论司法案件、影响判决的现象。"媒体审判"被指责违背无罪推定、干涉法院独立行使审判权、妨碍司法公正。然而媒体预先定罪仅是事实层面的推定,无悖于规范层面的无罪推定;法院独立行使审判权不应该也不能脱离媒体的监督;媒体报道司法有促进司法公正的价值,司法公正的效果需接受社会公众的检验和评价,法官不能忽视媒体所反映的民意。＂ Media trial＂ refers to the phenomenon that media reports and comments judicial cases in advance,which is said to affect sentence. ＂Media trial＂ is accused of violation of pre- sumption of innocence, Interference independently exercising the judicial power of courts, ob- struction of justice, However, media prior conviction aims at only factual presumption, not in the standard level of presumption of innocence ; Independently exercising the judicial power is not exclusive from media, Media reports judicial can promote Judicial justice, and the effect of justice must be inspected and evaluated by public, judge can not ignore the public opinion that media reflects.

关 键 词：媒体审判 无罪推定 独立行使审判权 司法公正 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]