BOT特许协议中的公众参与研究  

Public Participation in BOT Concession Agreement

作　　者：马龙君[1] 张松[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2017年第2期122-131,共10页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：BOT特许协议涉及到多方利益,尤其是公共利益(不确定的第三方利益)。从宁波常洪隧道项目的收费问题可知,我国在BOT特许协议的缔约过程中,公众参与是缺失的。因此,需要认真对待公众参与问题,尤其是公众参与缺失的原因及其引进的困难。首先,就新行政法理念、行政过程控制与实质合法性三个层面看,引入公众参与是可行且必要的。其次,我们有必要采域外(包括德、美与法)及我国台湾地区的行政合同等相关实践与理论之石,启示我国实践中存在的不足。最后,我国在建立公众参与制度的问题上,要以健全信息公开制度为前提,在此基础上完善协商与说明理由制度,并将此类纠纷纳入今后的行政公益诉讼。BOT concession agreement involves interests of different parties, especially public interest （the interest of uncertain third party）. In the process of reaching a BOT concession agreement in China, public participation is absent, which can be reflected from Changhong tunnel item dispute in Ningbo. Therefore, public participation issue should be treated seriously including the causes of lacking public participation and difficulties of involve it. Firstly, involving public participation is feasible and necessary, in terms of the three aspects： the theory of new administrative law, restriction of the administration process, and essential legitimacy. Secondly, it is necessary to learn relevant theories and practices on administrative contract to inspire reflection on the shortage of practice in China, from Taiwan（province）, Germany, the United Stated and France, etc. Finally, on the precise of improving information disclosure system, negotiation and illustration system should be perfected in order to establish public participation system in China. Besides, this kind of dispute is supposed to be included in the future administrative public interest litigation.

关 键 词：BOT特许协议 公众参与 信息公开 协商 公益诉讼 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]