中国古代治道论中的“和而不同”及其当代价值  

The Concept of Harmony in Diversity in Governance Theory in Ancient China and Its Contemporary Value

作　　者：吴显庆[1] 毛国民[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学政治与公共管理学院

出　　处：《广东社会科学》2017年第2期45-54,共10页Social Sciences in Guangdong

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目"中国古代辩证性政治和谐思想及其当代价值研究"(项目号12YJA810016)的阶段性成果

摘　　要："和而不同"的治道论,主要指国家治理途径、方法、方略及其制度的确定,应有不同见解互相补充和互相纠偏的种种论述,其中包括君臣关系论和决策批评制度论。作为可以防错纠错的政治思想和制度理论,其本身不属于民主范畴。但它以差异为价值,欣赏不同见解,鼓励反对意见,重视上下左右交换各自看法,包含了可"转接"于当代中国发展协商民主、完善行政决策制度等多种应用价值;它可以成为当代中国公共治理变革的思想方法、能够丰富当代公共决策理论的基本内容、指引当代公共决策的制度设计。马尾松大树枯烂后,往往遗存富集松油的树兜、核心或树节部分,它们仍然是相当好的发热和照明材料,这也是古代"和而不同"治道论可为当代中国治道理论和实践所运用的"根据"之所在。The concept ofharmony in diversityin governance theory suggests that the people who have different but complementary views should be involved in the process of changing policies and state institutions.It includes the theory about the relationship between the monarch and his officials,and the theory about criticisms of policies.It is a political institutional theory that opposes blind obedience and helps correct the mistakes,though it cannot be classified as a democratic theory.It emphasizes that the people having different views should be encouraged to exchange ideas.It offers some insights into how to promote the development of deliberative democracy and decision-making institutions in contemporary China.Furthermore,it offers the methods for considering governance reform in contemporary China,enriches the contemporary public decision theory and directs the design of the contemporary public decision-making institutions.

关 键 词：中国古代 治道论 和而不同 当代价值 

分 类 号：D092[政治法律—政治学]