检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段明学
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2017年第1期49-53,共5页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
摘 要:卷宗移送制度构成了职权主义诉讼模式与当事人主义诉讼模式的重要区别。在职权主义诉讼模式下,实行卷宗移送制度便于法官在庭前对案件作实体性审查,从而发现事实真相。但是,卷宗移送制度会导致法官在庭前形成预断或偏见,妨碍公平审判原则的实现。推进以审判为中心诉讼制度改革,需要改革卷宗移送制度,淡化书面卷宗对庭审的影响。鉴于中国的特殊国情,实行起诉书一本主义不切实际,双重卷宗制度是较为合理的选择。The file transfer system constitutes an important difference between the litigation model of the power and the litigation model of the party. Under the litigation mode of the power, the file transfer system is convenient for the judge to examine the case before the court, so as to discover the truth. However, the file transfer system will lead the judge to form predetermination or prejudice before the court to hinder the realization of the principle of fair trial. To promote the reform of the trial-centered litigation system, it is necessary to reform the file transfer system to dilute the impact of written files on the trial. In view of China's special national conditions, it is imprac- tical to implement the sole-filing system of indictment, but the double-filing system is a more reasonable choice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.252.90