检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周新[1] Zhou Xin;
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院博士后流动站
出 处:《政法论坛》2017年第2期74-82,共9页Tribune of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目"司法独立与司法问责机制研究"(14BFX055)的阶段性成果
摘 要:目前关于刑事申诉制度的研究多体现宏观式的分析,缺乏微观层面的探究。立法上刑事申诉相关法律文本规定过于模糊,虽有相对细致的审查规范但缺乏公开性,司法实践中刑事申诉仍存在申诉途径单一、立案标准较高并且自由裁量权过大、法定结果说理性不足等问题。因此未来应当出台专门的申诉制度运行规范,对申诉案件的受理适用立案登记制,进一步完善律师代理申诉制度和法律援助制度,在处理申诉案件过程中做好裁判文书说理的工作。此外,申诉听证制度的构建也是推动申诉规范化的必由之路。At present,the research on the criminal complaint system is mainly manifested macroscopic analysis,and lack of the micro-level exploration. In legislative level,the provisions of the relevant laws and regulations on criminal complaint are too vague. accordingly,in judicial practice,the method of the criminal claim is still single,the standard of filing is high,the discretion is too large,and the legal result is unreasonable. Therefore,in the future,we should take a series of measures,such as introducing a specification of the criminal complaint system,applying the registration system into the case,further improvement of the lawyer's proxy of complaint system and the legal aid system,and doing the work of referee's documents well in handling complaint cases. In addition,the construction of complaint hearing system is a must to promote the standardization of complaints.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15