道德增强:伦理困境与自然主义思考  

Moral Enhancement: Ethical Predicament and Naturalism Consideration

作　　者：叶岸滔[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学公共管理学院,博士研究生湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《学术月刊》2017年第3期40-47,共8页Academic Monthly

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"现代医疗技术中的生命伦理及其法律问题研究"(11&ZD177);国家社科基金重点项目"生命科学技术前沿的伦理问题研究"(12AZD071)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：近年来,能否通过生物医学方式增强人的道德品质是生命伦理和哲学领域极具争议的话题。支持者认为,这种方式能获得功利主义上的辩护。然而更多的反对者却认为,这是一种不必要的改进道德方式且存在许多伦理困境,如人的道德到底是自然的还是可以人为的,人的德性获得是否有捷径,道德增强后的人是否还具有人格同一性,人的自由如何体现,等等。从目前来看,这些问题还难以获得伦理辩护,道德增强本身的合法性需要进一步反思与论证。道德增强的争论本质上是围绕着道德是否具有生物学基础以及能否被生物医学技术所干预而展开的,其重要贡献是引发了学术界对道德自然主义的思考。Some scholars think that we can interfere human moral behavior by biomedicine; they name it moral enhancement, which can make human be more moral. However, moral enhancement can bring a lot of ethical issues such as the choose of treat and punish, nature of moral, acquire of virtue, identity and freedom of human and so on. The argument actually reflects the two different views about moral naturalism. Most philosophy and divinity scholars against moral enhancement while many scientists support for. Dialectically speaking, moral naturalism has its benefit for us, but it also has some thing need be anxious and care about. We should research more carefully and consider further and overall.

关 键 词：道德增强 伦理问题 自然主义 

分 类 号：B82[哲学宗教—伦理学]