检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王青[1]
出 处:《北京教育学院学报》2017年第1期70-74,共5页Journal of Beijing Institute of Education
摘 要:《国语·吴语》对于吴国史事的记载不如《左传》丰富,也有较多的歧义,与《越语》所载亦有明显的不同。特别是在黄池之会主盟者、夫椒之战发动者、越王勾践战败后如何遣使求和等问题上,这些歧义和不同体现得更加突出。近年问世的与吴国史有关的出土文献印证了《吴语》所载近乎历史的本真。《吴语》虽非典型的"语"体文,但有其独特的史料价值,应该引起我们足够的重视。As a part of Guo Yu,historical events recorded in Wu Yu was not as rich as Zuo Zhuan. There was a lot of ambiguity between them. In addition,the obvious difference could also be found through the comparison between Wu Yu and Chu Yu. The ambiguity and difference was more prominent especially on Monarchs meeting to form alliances in Huang Chi,the sponsor of the Fu Jiao War,Gou Jian suing for peace and so on. It had been proved that the historical records in Wu Yu was close to the authenticity of history on the basis of the unearthed document. In spite of an atypical style of Yu,the unique value of Wu Yu should be paid sufficient attention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15