检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京工业大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京210009 [2]江苏省科技政策思想库,江苏南京211816
出 处:《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第1期114-120,共7页Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71473120);江苏省软科学重点项目(BR2015060;BR2016058)
摘 要:基于科技活动类型(X)和政策工具(Y)两个维度,选取北京、上海、江苏和浙江作为样本区域,搜集并整理符合条件的高新技术产业科技政策,通过内容分析法对政策内容进行数量统计和文本挖掘。研究发现,从科技活动类型上看,科技政策的制定比较符合高新技术产业科技活动类型的特点;从政策工具上看,科技政策的制定表现出多元化的特点,各层面比较均衡,有进一步改进的空间,但也存在政府过度参与和政出多门的现象。因此,政府部门在制定高新技术产业科技政策时,要加大基础研究阶段和供给层面科技投入政策力度、增强政府财政资金的规范化、完善科技政策体系的融合度。The theoretical framework was based on two dimensions: scientific and technological activity types(horizontal axis)and policy instruments(vertical axis). The method of content analysis was adopted to analyze the four typical areas(Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang)after collecting and organizing high-tech industrial technology policies. The results show that from the horizontal axis, policy formulation is more in line with the characteristics of high-tech industry′s activity types; from the vertical axis, it shows the diversification of the policy formulation and all levels are more balanced, there is room for further improvement, problems shown as excessive government interference and confusing policy making. Suggestions were given as that from the aspect of basic research stage and supply level, government should enforce the policy intensity of technology investment, strengthen the standardization of the government funding and improve the integration of science and technology policy system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30