检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘晗[1]
出 处:《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第3期83-85,共3页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
摘 要:为了绩效,为了结案率,各地各级法院往往迫切需要可靠的证据凭以断案。我国司法实务中暴力取证、作伪证、拒绝作证等情况层出不穷,国内每每曝光证人遭受不公平对待的新闻,理论界对该问题也一直没能给予合理的疏解、指引。在强制证人出庭作证之声甚嚣尘上间余,证人的基本人权与合法权利往往为人们所忽视。故本文欲尝试一探证人免证制度背后的法经济学理,给证人一个说不的机会。Usually, courts at all levels are in urgent need of reliable evidence to close cases for their performance and the closing rate. In China judicial practice, many problems emerge in an endless stream such as taking evidence by force, perjury, reluctant to testify, numbers of reports relating to witnesses suffering from unfair treatment. Yet, the theorists are lack of the efforts to give the reasonable explanation and guidance. The basic human rights and legal rights of witnesses are often overlooked while a great clamor has arisen around compulsory testifying. Therefore, this thesis tries to tell the law and economics theory behind the testimonial privileges, giving witness a chance to say no.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46