辨《伤寒杂病论》序文真伪及其与《黄帝内经》的关系  

Authenticity of Preface of Treatise on Cold-Induced and Miscellaneous Diseases and Relationship Between It and Huangdi's Canon of Internal Medicine

作　　者：王雷[1] 明子荐 

机构地区：[1]山东中医药高等专科学校,山东烟台264199

出　　处：《中医学报》2017年第3期383-385,共3页Acta Chinese Medicine

基　　金：国家中医药管理局第一批全国中医学术流派传承工作室建设项目{【2012】228号};山东省中医药科技发展计划项目(2015-209)

摘　　要：《伤寒杂病论》是对《黄帝内经》的医经思维和《汤液经法》的经方思维继承与融合,其中"伤寒"之名及时间医学的观点均源于《黄帝内经》。但近代部分中医名家否定《伤寒杂病论》序文的真实性,继而否定《伤寒杂病论》与《黄帝内经》的密切关系。争论的焦点主要有以下几个方面:(1)句仗、语法之争;(2)声韵、引文之辨;(3)浑说、详说之论;(4)余、我之论。Treatise on Cold-Induced and Miscellaneous Diseases （Shang Han Za Bing Lun ） is the inheritance and fusion of the medical thinking of Huangdi＇s Canon of Internal Medicine （Huang Di Nei Jing ） and the prescription thinking of Prescription Method of Decoction （Tang Ye Jing Fa）, in which the concept of ＂ Cold-Induced and Miscellaneous Diseases＂ and the idea of chronomedicine came from the classic Huangdi＇s Canon oflnternal Medicine （Huang Di Nei Jing）. However, some modem Chinese medicine experts denied the authenticity of the preface of Treatise on Febrile and Miscellaneous Diseases （ Shang Hart Za Bing Lun ） and then denied the close relationship between the Treatise on Febrile and Miscellaneous Diseases （ Shang Hart Za Bing Lun ） and Huangdi＇s Canon of lnternal Medicine （Huang Di Nei Jing）. The focus of the debate mainly in the following areas：（1） Sentence and grammar;（2） Rhyme and citation;（3） General illustration and Detailed illustration;（4） Personal Reference of the author.

关 键 词：伤寒杂病论 序文 黄帝内经 中医理论 

分 类 号：R222.2[医药卫生—中医基础理论]