侦查阶段律师调查取证权的实现困局与完善路径  

Dilemma and Breakthrough:On the Realization of Lawyers' Right of Investigation and Evidence Collection in Investigation

作　　者：高一飞[1] 王金建[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第2期50-58,共9页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目(14AFX013);中国法学会"深入研究党的十八届四中全会精神"重点专项课题(CLS(2015)ZDZX10)

摘　　要：在现代刑事诉讼中,调查取证权是律师辩护权的基本内容,我国《刑事诉讼法》第41条对此进行了规定,包括侦查阶段律师的调查取证权。但是由于立法对侦查阶段律师调查取证权的规定不明、相应的操作性规范缺位、律师执业保障不足、社会认识偏差等一系列原因,我国律师在侦查阶段的调查取证遭遇制度和实践的双重困境。我国应当充分认识到侦查阶段律师调查取证的特殊意义,加快完善律师的执业保障机制,明确规定侦查阶段律师的调查取证权及其范围和方式,进一步规范律师刑事责任的认定和追究机制。In the modern criminal procedure, the right to investigate and collect evidence is the basic content of the lawyer＇s right of defense. Article 41 of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates this, including the right of investigation and evidence collection of the lawyer at the investigation stage. However, As the legislation on the investigation stage of lawyers to investigate and collect evidence is not clear, the lack of corresponding operational rules, Inadequate protection of lawyers and social misunderstanding, and so on, for our lawyers, investigating and collecting evidence in the investigation stage is facing the double difficulties of system and practice. Our country should speed up the improvement of the lawyer＇s practice safeguard mechanism, fully aware of the special significance of lawyers＇ investigation and evidence collection at the investigation stage, clearly stipulate the right of investigation and evidence collection of lawyers at the investigation stage and its scope and way, further standardize the mechanism of determining and investigating the criminal responsibility of lawyers.

关 键 词：侦查阶段 律师 调查取证权 

分 类 号：D925.213[政治法律—诉讼法学]