检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西警察学院,山西太原030021 [2]山西大学语言科学研究所,山西太原030006 [3]中央军委政法委侦察技术中心,北京100120
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2017年第1期50-55,共6页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
基 金:2012年度国家社会科学青年基金项目(12CYY015)
摘 要:目的探究通过异声同韵音节进行语音同一性检验的可行性。方法利用VS-99计算机语音工作站对异声同韵音节的共振峰等特性进行定性与定量分析。结果得出在语音同一性检验中,异声同韵音节具有一定的可比性,但首先应选用异声同韵同调音节,其次再选用异声同韵异调音节进行比对;异声同韵音节进行共振峰比较时宜在发音部位相同或相近的音节间进行;选用异声同韵音节时应选用韵母中部共振峰进行比对等一些规律性认识。结论为利用异声同韵音节进行语音同一性检验提供了客观依据。Objective To study the feasibility of applying formants of syllables with different initials in speech identification.Method The broad-band spectrum and the long-term LPC of syllables with different initials were compared qualitatively and quantitatively by a VS-99 Voice Station. Results Syllables differing in initials have certain comparability in forensic speaker identification. The recommended order is:( 1) identical syllables only different in consonant which is caused by phonation type;(2) identical syllables different in consonant and tone which is caused by phonation type;(3) identical syllables different in consonant which is caused by adjacent articulator;(4) identical syllables different in consonant and tone which is caused by adjacent articulator;(5) identical syllables different in consonant which is caused by non-adjacent articulator. Conclusion The study provides an objective basis for speech identification using the formants of syllables differing in initials.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15