“三社联动”主体及角色再定位：基于社区治理实务视角  

Subject and Role Repositioning of Sanshe Linkage:Based on Perspective of Community Governance Practices

作　　者：石兵营[1] 谭琪[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华北电力大学人文学院,河北保定071002 [2]日本爱知大学大学院

出　　处：《社会工作》2017年第1期89-98,共10页Journal of Social Work

基　　金：河北省哲学社会科学基金规划项目“综合治理视域中河北省城市边缘社区治安防控问题研究”(HB16GL064)

摘　　要："三社联动"概念中所指主体应为哪些?角色如何定位?准确认知分外重要。但在理论与实务界缺乏统一意见,观点多元。基于深圳、保定社区治理改革实践对上述问题再认知:"三社"直接主体——社区主体是两委一站、社会组织主体是社会工作机构及相关社会组织、社工主体是专业社工及社区工作者;"三社"相关主体——基层政府、社区居民骨干等。两类主体角色再定位:基层政府为规划者;两委一站为自治领导;社会组织策划服务项目;社工提供服务。Two issues in the concept of Sanshe linkage were very important. what were the subjects in the concept? How were the roles located? There was no uniform view on this issue in theory and practice. Based on the practice of community governance reform in Shenzhen and Baoding, the authors rethink the problems. There were three direct subjects in the SSaannsshhee. Community subject included two committees and one station; The subject of social organization included social work organization and some Social organizations; The subject of Social workers included professional social workers and community workers. Sanshe related subjects included grass-roots government and relevant departments, community residents' activists.Two types of subject roles need to be relocated. Grass-roots governments were planners; Community subject were responsible for autonomous leadership; Social workers organization should be responsible for assessing community needs, planning service projects; Social workers should provide community services.

关 键 词：三社联动 多元观点 联动主体 角色 

分 类 号：C916[经济管理]