专门证据的两个概念性困难  

The two conceptual difficulties of specialized evidence

作　　者： 刘世权(译)[3] 张保生(校)[3] 满运龙(校)[4] Ronald J. Allen Lausanne Switzerland

机构地区：[1]美国西北大学 [2]中国政法大学证据科学研究院外国专家咨询委员会 [3]中国政法大学证据科学研究院 [4]北京大学国际法学院

出　　处：《证据科学》2017年第1期114-128,F0003,共16页Evidence Science

摘　　要：我非常荣幸受邀在此发表演讲。我对在座的很多人都充满敬意。在中国同事中包括一些积极推动中国法治＂长征＂的学者。~1考虑到荒唐的反右和文革摧毁了理性法律制度的任何痕迹,使法律知识在中国遭受了灭顶之灾,法学院停办,法学书刊被焚,这一努力实属不易。近年来,我也非常钦佩瑞士法庭科学家在各领域建立概念和实证基础的努力,以及对本演讲题目—专门证据给争端之法律解决提出的概念性困难—所做的勇敢尝试。I am distinctively honored to be asked to deliver this address. My admiration for many of the people in this room is overflowing. Among the Chinese are those who are, literally, responsible for facilitating the long march of China to the rule of law.1 This is no easy task, given the insanity of the Anti-Rightist Movement and the Cultural Revolution that together destroyed any semblance of a rational legal system and as a by-product extirpated, again literally, legal knowledge from China; law schools were closed and books were burned. Over the last few years,

关 键 词：性困难 法庭科学 科学研究机构 中国法治 演讲题目 实证基础 LEGAL 事实认定 证据法 forensic 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]