论法官的查明责任与诉讼模式  

On the Judge's Identifying Responsibility and Litigation Mode

作　　者：李峣[1] 陈庆凤 

机构地区：[1]北京政法职业学院应用法律系,北京102628 [2]山东省成武县人民检察院,山东菏泽274200

出　　处：《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第1期38-44,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：不同的诉讼模式下法官探究案件事实的方式差异极大,当事人主义模式之下的法官多承担消极的查明义务,而职权主义诉讼模式下法官承担一定程度的证明责任。衡平主义诉讼模式则取折中态度,要求法官和当事人一起完成证据材料的查找与收集来探明案件真实。基于此,我国诉讼模式的选择需以发挥法官的主观能动性与尊重当事人处分权及辩论权为前提来追求诉讼义务的平衡。Different litigation modes and evidence respons ibility borne by the judge show great differences and the judge bears passive responsibility to identify the fact of cases under the model of parties-orientation. This model puts too much emphasis on the debate between the parties, and the principle of balance litigation requires the judge and the parties to find and collect the evidence and detect the case,that is, the balance of litigation obligations can be completed on the basis of playing the role of the subjective initiative of the judge and respect the parties to deal with the right and the right to debate.

关 键 词：法官 民事诉讼 查明责任 证明责任 诉讼模式 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]