检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李国强[1] 罗敬[1] 郑志坚[1] 张锦宏[2] 陈爱辉[3] 杨海坤[4]
机构地区:[1]广东省梅州市人民医院放疗科,514000 [2]广东省梅州市人民医院化疗科,514000 [3]广东省梅州市人民医院放射治疗室科,514000 [4]广东省梅州市人民医院妇科,514000
出 处:《白求恩医学杂志》2017年第2期141-143,共3页Journal of Bethune Medical Science
基 金:梅州市科技计划项目(编号:2015B013)
摘 要:目的评价采用容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)联合同步化疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌的近期疗效及毒副反应。方法将经病理确诊的72例中晚期宫颈癌患者随机分为两组,各36例。给予对照组适形调强放疗(IMRT)联合同步化疗;给予观察组VMAT联合同步化疗;对比两组的近期疗效及毒副反应,随访生存情况。结果两组患者近期疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组患者肿瘤均明显缩小(P<0.01),观察组患者肿瘤缩小幅度大于对照组(P<0.01)。治疗期间,观察组患者骨髓抑制发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);随访1年,两组的一年生存率、远处转移率、局部控制率及卡氏(KPS)评分对比未见显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论相较于IMRT,VMAT联合同步化疗可更好的缩小肿瘤体积,减少中晚期宫颈癌的血液毒性,具有较高的临床应用前景。Objective To evaluate the short-term efficacy and side effects of VMAT combined with concurrent chemotherapy in the treatment of middle stage and advanced cervical cancer. Methods Seventy-two patients with middle stage and advanced cervical cancer and confirmed by pathology were divided into two groups( n = 36 each group). The control group was treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy, while the experimental group was given VMAT combined with concurrent chemotherapy. Then,the short-term efficacy and side effects and differences in survival rates during follow-ups, were compared between the two groups. Results The clinical remission rate in the experimental group was 97. 22%, higher than that of the control group( 94.44% ), with no significant difference (P 〉 0.05 ) ;Before treatment, there was no significant difference in tumor size between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ) ; After treatment, tumors in two groups were significantly reduced ( P 〈 0. 01 ), but the reduced size of the experimental group was significantly less than that of the control group (P 〈 0. 01 ) ;there was statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of bone marrow suppression with a lower rate in the experimental group ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; All the patients were followed up for 1 years, and there was no significant difference in the overall survival rate, distant metastasis rate,local control rate and KPS score between the two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion Compared with IMRT, VMAT combined with concurrent chemotherapy can reduce tumor size and reduce the blood toxicity in middle stage and advanced cervical cancer patients with good clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.97