检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学卫生管理与政策研究所,西安710061
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2017年第5期59-64,共6页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:陕西省社会科学基金项目(13Q089)
摘 要:目的:分析新型农村合作医疗总额预付制对次均住院补偿、住院补偿比、次均住院自付费用和住院自付比例的影响。方法:采用倍差法控制非干预因素,测算总额预付制的净影响。结果:新型农村合作医疗总额预付制使次均住院补偿下降了14.37元,但不具有统计学意义;住院补偿比上升了5.23个百分点,次均住院自付费用下降了141.51元,自付比例下降了5.23个百分点,均有统计学意义;对具体病种的影响存在差异。结论:新型农村合作医疗总额预付提高了住院受益程度,但因病种不同而不同,总额预付标准测算仍需科学化与合理化。Objective: To analyze the effect of global budget of New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) on the per-visit inpatient compensations, inpatient compensation ratios, per-visit inpatient out-of-pocket expenses and inpatient out-of-pocket rates. Methods: The difference in difference method was used to control the non-intervention factors and estimate the net impact of global budget. Results: Global budget of NCMS decreased the per-visit inpatient compensations by 14.37 yuan, but it had no statistical significance. The compensation ratio of hospitalization increased by 5.23%, the average hospitalization self-payment decrease by 141.51 yuan, the self-payment decreased by 5.23%, which all had statistical significance while there were differences on the effects for specific diseases. Conclusion: Global budget of NCMS increased the inpatient benefit, but the effect was varies by conditions. In addition, measurement of global budget' s standard still needed to be scientific and reasonable.
分 类 号:F323.89[经济管理—产业经济] F842.684[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R197.1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.36