检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《工业工程与管理》2017年第2期76-82,共7页Industrial Engineering and Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171134);上海市一流学科建设项目(S1201YLXK);上海市高原学科(管理科学与工程)资助项目;沪江基金资助项目(A14006)
摘 要:以特许经营基础设施工程为研究对象,建立了公共部门,建设及服务提供方和私人投资方的三方合作博弈模型,利用Shapley值法分析了三者在基础设施工程融资联盟中的合作收益分配问题。计算了三种融资模式下各参与方的合作收益分配值,并对不同融资联盟模式对利益分配的影响进行了分析。研究表明:如果融资联盟参与方实际承担的风险大于期望风险时,其原合作收益分配量会增加,如果小于期望风险则原合作收益分配量会减小。同时,在特许经营管理的基础设施工程融资联盟中当参与方的合作形式发生变化时,其各方所承担的实际风险会发生转移,从而影响联盟参与方的最终合作收益分配量。对于基础设施工程中融资联盟及参与方的合作机制与利益分配方式的研究对解决基础设施工程管理中的合作协调问题具有重要的启发意义和参考借鉴作用。A game model of the public sector, construction and service providers, and private investors was set up with franchise infrastructure projects as the research object. The Shapley value was applied to analyze three parties~ cooperation benefit distribution in financing infrastructure projects. Calculated cooperate benefit distribution value of participants under three financing models. Analyzed the impact of different financing model on the distribution of benefits. The result show that when the risk carried by financing alliance participants is greater than the expected risk, its original cooperation benefit distribution will increase. When the risk is less than the expected, the amount of the original distribution of cooperation benefit will decrease. Additionally, when the way of cooperation changes, actual risk in financing alliance of franchise management infrastructure projects transfers, which will affect the amount of the benefit distribution of participants. The research marks significance in solving cooperation issues in infrastructure project management.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15