强制医疗机构:基于专业性与合法性的双重考量  

Compulsory Medical Institutions: Double Consideration Based on the Professionalism and Legitimacy

作　　者：徐文晶[1] 朱奎彬[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院 [2]西南交通大学公共管理与政法学院

出　　处：《医学与法学》2017年第1期26-29,共4页Medicine and Jurisprudence

基　　金：四川医事卫生法治研究中心立项资助项目"强制医疗程序中公安机关的职能优化路径探析"(项目编号:YF15-Y04)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国《刑事诉讼法(修正案)》和《精神卫生法》的出台,将强制医疗程序纳入了法治的轨道,但对临时性保护措施的地点和执行强制医疗的机构却规定不明,导致实务中操作不一。咋解决这一问题,关键在于如何实现医疗机构专业性与合法性之间的平衡:医疗机构具备专业的医疗技术和人员,对治疗和帮助精神病人有其特有的优势,因此应进一步明确医疗机构在强制医疗程序中的地位和作用;同时,还应通过立法明确各方职责,并促进公安与医疗力量相结合、推动医疗机构内部合理分工与相互监督,以解决现有法律法规缺失、公安部门与医疗机构缺乏交流合作和医疗力量受限等问题。With the enactment of Criminal Procedure Law （Amendment） and Mental Health Act in China, compulsory medical procedures were brought into legal orbit. But the location of temporary protection measures and the mandatory medical institutions are not clear in the law, which results in mixed operation in practice. And the key solution to the problem is to realize the balance between the professionalism and legality of medical institutions. Medical institutions have professional medical technology and personnel, have their unique advantages in helping and treating mental patients Therefore, we should further clarify the position and role of medical institutions in mandatory medical procedures. Meanwhile, we should make clear the responsibilities through legislation, and promote the combination of the public security department and the medical resources, promote reasonable division of labor and mutual supervision within medical institutions, in this way we may overcome the lack of existing laws and regulations, the lack of communication and cooperation between public security departments and medical institutions, and the limit of medical resources, etc..

关 键 词：强制医疗 医疗机构 专业性 合法性 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]